Why are updates to Kotlin, Compose, and KSP such a hassle?

In Android development, you're constantly dealing with the same set of three: Kotlin, the Compose Compiler, and KSP.

They seem like a friendly group, but their update schedules are always completely different! You upgrade Kotlin, and the Compose Compiler isn't compatible. You change something, and KSP throws a build error because of an internal API change...

To better manage this "dependency triangle" situation, the main idea is to use Renovate's configuration to treat them as a single unit. The simple plan is: "Raise all Kotlin ecosystem dependencies at the same time!"

 

🧑🏻‍💻 Brief overview of the renovate.json file


{
  "$schema": "https://docs.renovatebot.com/renovate-schema.json",
  "extends": [
    "config:base",
    "group:all",
    ":dependencyDashboard",
    "schedule:daily"
  ],
  "baseBranches": ["main"],
  "commitMessageExtra": "{{{currentValue}}} to {{#if isPinDigest}}{{{newDigestShort}}}{{else}}{{#if isMajor}}{{prettyNewMajor}}{{else}}{{#if isSingleVersion}}{{prettyNewVersion}}{{else}}{{#if newValue}}{{{newValue}}}{{else}}{{{newDigestShort}}}{{/if}}{{/if}}{{/if}}{{/if}}",
  "packageRules": [
    {
      "matchPackagePatterns": ["androidx.compose.compiler:compiler"],
      "groupName": "kotlin"
    },
    {
      "matchPackagePatterns": ["org.jetbrains.kotlin.*"],
      "groupName": "kotlin"
    },
    {
      "matchPackagePatterns": ["com.google.devtools.ksp"],
      "groupName": "kotlin"
    }
  ]
}

👉 architecture-samples/renovate.json at main · android/architecture-samples

Roughly summarized, here are the key points:

  • groupName: "kotlin" to bundle dependencies This setting specifies that the three elements—the Compose Compiler, Kotlin, and KSP—should be treated as belonging to the "same group." This allows Renovate to update them all together at once.
  • schedule: daily for a calm update pace This checks for updates once a day. You'll receive pull requests (PRs) on a daily basis, preventing a huge influx of dependency updates all at once, which makes things much easier to manage.
  • commitMessageExtra to see changes at a glance The version difference, like "2.0.10 → 2.0.20," is automatically added to the PR title. It's a small tweak, but surprisingly useful.

Setting up your configuration this way significantly reduces the tragedy of "Kotlin got updated, but Compose broke..."

 

🧑🏻‍💻 What We Found While Using It

Once this setup is in place, you can feel much more confident testing updates for everything Kotlin-related. Renovate diligently checks daily, automatically creating a PR whenever a new version drops.

But there's one small warning:

The Compose Compiler sometimes takes a little extra time to catch up to the latest Kotlin version. So, don't just merge the PR when you see it—it's highly recommended to verify the CI status first.

KSP is similar; because it depends on Kotlin's internal workings, it's safer to update it along with Kotlin and run your tests together.

 

🧑🏻‍💻 Summary: Teach Renovate that "These Three Are a Set"

The configuration we discussed treats the trio of Kotlin, the Compose Compiler, and KSP as a single group.

  • Bundle all Kotlin-related dependencies for simultaneous updates.
  • Check for updates at a manageable daily pace.
  • See version differences directly in the PR title.

Just implementing this significantly reduces the problems caused by versions getting out of sync and breaking your build.

💡 Key Takeaway: Use Renovate less as an "automatic update tool" and more as a "dependency rulebook."

We simply need to tell Kotlin, Compose, and KSP to cooperate and "work together."

👉 Kotlin・Compose・KSP の更新、どうしてこんなに面倒なの?


Checking Your Cable Specs: The Secret Lies in the Wires

When connecting your smartphone or development device to your computer, have you ever thought,

“Why is the transfer so slow?” or “Why am I getting connection warnings?”

One often overlooked cause is the cable’s specifications. Even if two USB cables look identical, their internal structure and supported standards can make a huge difference.

This time, I tried using a USB cable tester to see how we can easily check a cable’s actual specs.

 

🤔 What You Can Learn with the Treedix USB Cable Tester

The tool I used is the Treedix USB Cable Tester Board, which supports multiple connector types such as USB-A, Type-C, and Micro-B.
It can test both data transfer and charging performance — a very handy little board.

👉 Treedix USB ケーブル テスター ボード USB ケーブル チェッカー データ ワイヤ 充電 テスト データ ライン タイプ C – Treedix Official

👉 TREEDIX USB Cable Tester Manual - Test USB Cables for Charging and Data Transfer

According to its manual, if the LEDs for “High-Speed Charging” and “High-Speed Data” light up, it means the cable supports USB 3.x.

If they don’t light up, the cable is only USB 2.0 level.

In short, this tiny board lets you instantly “see” the invisible differences inside your cables.

 

🤔 Test Results: USB 2.0 vs USB 3.x

First, I tested the cable I had been using regularly — and it turned out to be USB 2.0.
Apparently, it was almost a charging-only cable with no proper data lines.

Next, I tested a recently purchased Buffalo cable. This time, the USB 3.x indicators lit up clearly, confirming that it supports high-speed data transfer.

When I switched to this cable for connecting my Android device to Android Studio, the connection warnings disappeared completely — the link became much more stable.

👉 Amazon.co.jp: バッファロー BUFFALO USB3.1 Gen2ケーブル(C to C) PD3A 1.0m ブラック 【 iPhone 17 / 17 pro 動作確認済み 】 BSUCC312P3A10BK : パソコン・周辺機器

However, I didn’t feel much difference in actual transfer speed, suggesting that other factors (like device or build performance) may be the real bottleneck.

 

🤔 Conclusion: Visualize Your Cables for Peace of Mind

A USB cable isn’t “just a wire.”

Its performance depends on which internal signal lines are actually connected.

Using a cable tester lets you easily determine whether your cable is charging-only, data-transfer capable, or high-speed compatible.

Especially for developers or anyone who needs a reliable connection, it’s worth testing your cables at least once.

Once you understand what’s inside, you’ll choose better cables and avoid unnecessary frustration in the future.

👉 実機デバッグで出る「Connection speed warning」とは ⚡


“Install Error(-10)” Got You Stuck? The Hidden Trick to Beat Google Play’s Pre-launch Test

 

🤔 Why the “App Not Owned” Error Happens

If your app fails the Google Play Pre-launch Test with this scary message —

u9.a: -10: Install Error(-10): The app is not owned by any user on this device.
An app is "owned" if it has been acquired from Play.

— you’re not alone.

This happens because the Pre-launch Test runs on Google’s own test devices, which aren’t linked to your Play account or purchase history.
So, if your app uses Play Core libraries (like AppUpdateManager or AppReviewManager), the “ownership check” fails, and your app never even gets installed.

It’s one of those bugs that make you scream: “But it works fine on my phone!” 😩

 

🤔 The Secret Fix Google Never Told You

Here’s the insider trick that devs have quietly been using:


Settings.System.getString(context.contentResolver, "firebase.test.lab")

This line reveals whether your app is currently running inside Firebase Test Lab — the same environment used for Pre-launch Tests.
If the value is "true", you’re in a test device.
That means you can safely skip anything that requires Play services or user ownership checks.

Here’s how to use it:


val isTestLab = Settings.System.getString(context.contentResolver, "firebase.test.lab") == "true"
if (!isTestLab) {
    // Run Play Core logic only in real user environments
}

Boom. 💣
No more random -10 install errors.
Your Pre-launch Test will finally pass like a charm.

 

⚡ Summary

The “Install Error(-10)” is not a bug in your code — it’s a Play Console quirk.
By detecting the Test Lab environment with:


Settings.System.getString(context.contentResolver, "firebase.test.lab")

you can bypass Play-related ownership checks and let your app install smoothly during the Pre-launch Test.

A single line of code could be the difference between “Test failed 🚫” and “Release ready ✅” — now that’s a win worth sharing.

👉 Firebase Test Lab × リリース前レポート環境を見分けるKotlin実装